1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. A.D.2d
  4. 168 A.D.2d
  5. 168 A.D.2d 263 (1990)
 

ORIMEX TRADING, INC. v. BERMAN

168 A.D.2d 263 (1990)

Orimex Trading, Inc., Respondent, v. Ben Berman, Appellant

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

December 6, 1990

It is within the IAS court's discretion to determine whether or not a party has shown a reasonable excuse for a default (Sanders & Assocs. v Hague Dev. Corp., 100 A.D.2d 964, 965). Here, defendant's excuse for his default was that he was not properly served. The record supports the IAS court's conclusion to the contrary, and we find no reason to disturb that conclusion on appeal.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases