The record reveals that the IAS court properly determined that the plaintiff law firm was entitled to the compensation sought for legal services rendered on defendant's behalf through August 1985, despite defendant's claim that he had terminated that law firm's authority to represent him in May 1985.
Specifically, no bona fide issues of fact exist to warrant a reversal of the IAS court's ruling, since defendant failed to present documentary evidence of a discharge...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
