BECK v. BECK


239 N.J. Super. 183 (1990)

570 A.2d 1273

M. ARTHUR BECK, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SUSAN M. BECK, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided March 2, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Howard Stern argued the cause for appellant (Stern, Steiger, Croland, Tanenbaum & Schielke, attorneys; Joan G. Waks, on the brief).

John A. Montecuollo argued the cause for respondent (G. Dolph Corradino, attorney).

Before Judges PRESSLER, LANDAU and LOWENGRUB.


The opinion of the court was delivered by PRESSLER, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff M. Arthur Beck and defendant Susan M. Beck were divorced by judgment entered on June 17, 1979. During the nearly eleven years which have since elapsed, there have been frequent post-judgment applications to enforce, modify or terminate various of the obligations then imposed upon the parties. The present appeal is taken by plaintiff from an order entered on March 31, 1989, on defendant's enforcement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases