DuBOIS v. DeLARM


243 N.J. Super. 175 (1990)

578 A.2d 1250

DUBOIS, SHEEHAN, HAMILTON AND DUBOIS, PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. SUSAN DELARM, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided August 10, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

DuBois, Sheehan, Hamilton, & DuBois, attorneys for appellant (Daniel M. Replogle, III on the brief).

Applebaum and Goldfield, attorneys for respondent (Mitchell Lee Goldfield on the brief).

Before Judges PETRELLA, O'BRIEN and STERN.


The opinion of the court was delivered by STERN, J.A.D.

In this case, concerning application of the "doctrine of necessaries" to legal expenses, plaintiff appeals from a judgment of no cause for action in favor of defendant. We reverse and remand for further proceedings.

Kenneth O. DeLarm III (DeLarm) retained plaintiff law firm in 1983 to represent him in connection with a pending custody action involving one of his two children from his then marriage. The...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases