1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 225 Cal.App.3d
  5. 225 Cal.App.3d 191 (1990)
 

COM. FOR RESPONS. PLAN. v. CITY OF INDIAN WELLS

Docket No. E006796.

225 Cal.App.3d 191 (1990)

275 Cal. Rptr. 57

COMMITTEE FOR RESPONSIBLE PLANNING et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. CITY OF INDIAN WELLS et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fourth District, Division Two.

November 15, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Cynthia Ludvigsen for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Rutan & Tucker, Leonard A. Hampel, Dan Slater, McDonough, Holland & Allen, T. Brent Hawkins, Kathryn A. Hoover and William J. Adams, City Attorney, for Defendants and Respondents.

OPINION

DABNEY, Acting P.J.

This controversy arises from the City of Indian Wells' approvals for and adoption of redevelopment plans and environmental impact reports (EIRs) for the Roadrunner Redevelopment Project Area (Roadrunner project) and Consolidated Whitewater Redevelopment Project Area (Whitewater project).1 Appellant, Committee for Responsible Planning...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases