In this robbery of two complainants by defendant and two accomplices, defendant contends that an impermissible showup was conducted. At the time the identification was made, the officers did not know that a robbery had been committed and therefore the subsequent identification by witnesses who came over to the police car and identified defendant was spontaneous, and not police arranged.
Defendant's argument that he should have been permitted to examine the identifying...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
