1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 168 Ariz.
  5. 168 Ariz. 234 (1990)
 

MARICOPA COUNTY v. BARKLEY

No. 1 CA-CV 89-251.

168 Ariz. 234 (1990)

812 P.2d 1052

MARICOPA COUNTY, a Political Subdivision, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Robert BARKLEY and Jane Doe Barkley, Husband and Wife; Frank H. Estes and Jane Doe Estes, Husband and Wife, Defendants-Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department E.

Review Denied July 16, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Maricopa County Atty's Office by James R. Minter, Phoenix, and John D. Helm, Helm & Kyle, Ltd., Tempe, for plaintiff-appellant.

Laird & Schneck, P.C. by Jerry Steele, Phoenix, for defendants-appellees.

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

This appeal is brought by Maricopa County from a judgment of the Yavapai County Superior Court in a condemnation action instituted by Maricopa County.

Maricopa County filed this action in the Superior Court of Maricopa County in 1984. The county sought to condemn about sixty-six acres of land within a larger parcel located in the bed of the Agua Fria River and owned by appellees Barkley and Estes. The county intended to use...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases