1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 219 Cal.App.3d
  5. 219 Cal.App.3d 181 (1990)
 

GRANQUIST v. SANDBERG

Docket No. C006466.

219 Cal.App.3d 181 (1990)

268 Cal. Rptr. 109

JUDITH GRANQUIST, as Special Administrator, etc., Plaintiff and Appellant, v. DANIEL H. SANDBERG, Defendant and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, Third District.

March 28, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Dwight Bishop, Bishop & Frick, Martha F. Bartkiewicz and Bryce C. Anderson for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Lisa K. Hightower, Heron, Burchette, Ruckert & Rothwell, James R. Kirby II and Segal & Kirby for Defendant and Respondent.

OPINION

EVANS, Acting P.J.

In this legal malpractice action, the personal representative of the estate of Robert Badal (plaintiff) appeals from a judgment in favor of Attorney Daniel H. Sandberg (defendant) entered after defendant's demurrer to plaintiff's second amended complaint was sustained without leave to amend. We reverse.

(1) A demurrer challenges only the legal sufficiency of the complaint, not the truth...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases