1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. S.C.
  4. 302 S.C.
  5. 302 S.C. 97 (1990)
 

HALBERSBERG v. BERRY

1508

302 S.C. 97 (1990)

394 S.E.2d 7

David HALBERSBERG, Respondent v. William BERRY, Catherine M. Berry and Fun Fashions, Inc., Appellants. David HALBERSBERG, Respondent v. William BERRY, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina.

Decided May 29, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John P. Henry and Emma Ruth Brittain of Thompson, Henry, Gwin, Brittain & Stevens, Conway, for appellants.

Howell V. Bellamny, Jr., and Preston B. Haines, III of Bellamy, Rutenberg, Copeland, Epps, Gravely & Bowers, Myrtle Beach, for respondent.

Heard April 18, 1990.

Decided May 29, 1990.

CURETON, Judge:

The central issue in this appeal is whether partnership relationships existed between Appellants, William and Catherine Berry, and the Respondent, David Halbersberg. The Berrys appeal from a holding that partnership relationships existed and the Berrys should account to Halbersberg for profits and damages. We affirm as modified.

The Berrys...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases