OCSTATE v. SMITS

No. 22428-0-I.

58 Wn. App. 333 (1990)

792 P.2d 565

CATHE STATE OF WASHINGTON, Respondent, v. BARRY JAY SMITS, Appellant.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

June 25, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey A. Thigpen and Herships & Tario, for appellant.

David S. McEachran, Prosecuting Attorney, and Ronald C. Hardesty, Special Deputy, for respondent.


GROSSE, A.C.J.

Barry Jay Smits (Smits) appeals his conviction for the assault of a police officer. His contentions are two-fold: (1) the trial court erred in disallowing cross examination of the police officer as to his potential financial interest from a (possible) civil suit against Smits, and (2) instructional error in that the trial court erred in instructing the jury with regard to the necessity of a person producing a driver's license when asked by a police...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases