IN RE BREISCH

Bankruptcy No. 89-21054T.

118 B.R. 271 (1990)

In re Harold W. BREISCH and Joan M. Breisch, individually and t/a Breisch's Sharpening and Mower Service, Debtors.

United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.

September 13, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John A. Di Giamberardino, Huckabee & Weiler, Wyomissing, Pa., for debtors.

Clemson N. Page, Jr., Bingaman, Hess, Coblentz & Bell, Reading, Pa., for Signal Consumer Discount Co.


OPINION

THOMAS M. TWARDOWSKI, Chief Judge.

A secured creditor, Signal Consumer Discount Company ("Signal") has filed an objection to confirmation of debtors' chapter 13 plan. Signal maintains that debtors' plan does not comply with 11 U.S.C. § 1325(a)(5)(B)(ii) because the plan does not require that interest be paid to Signal at the rate specified in the parties' contract. Rather, debtors' plan contemplates payment of interest to Signal at

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases