1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 167 Ariz.
  5. 167 Ariz. 219 (1990)
 

CAHN v. FISHER

No. 1 CA-CV 89-167.

167 Ariz. 219 (1990)

805 P.2d 1040

Harry CAHN and Conrad R. Blain dba Cahn and Blain, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. H. Richmond FISHER and Jane Doe Fisher; Francis P. Smith and Jane Doe Smith; dba Fisher and Smith, Defendants-Appellants.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 1, Department D.

Review Denied March 5, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fisher and Smith by Daniel J. Terrell, Francis P. Smith, Phoenix, for defendants-appellants.

Stanley M. Hammerman, Phoenix, for plaintiffs-appellees.

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

In this appeal, two lawyers challenge a summary judgment holding the defendant lawyers liable for the cost of deposition transcripts ordered by the lawyers from the plaintiff court reporters.

The lawyers claim that because they merely acted as agents for their client, and because they disclosed that they acted only in a representative capacity for an identified principal, only the client is responsible for the court reporters...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases