Defendant's guilt flows naturally from the evidence, which established that he was an active, albeit furtive, participant in the sale of narcotics. Defendant had no direct contact with police, and while there was no evidence that he physically possessed the drugs, his participation in the sale was established by strong circumstantial evidence, including the use of defendant's apartment and proof that he profited from the transaction.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.