1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Conn.
  4. 21 Conn.
  5. 21 Conn. App. 351 (1990)
 

POPROSKY v. SHEA

(7579)

21 Conn. App. 351 (1990)

DANIEL J. POPROSKY ET AL. v. JEREMIAH SHEA ET AL.

Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Decision released May 1, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John D. Boland, for the appellants (plaintiffs).

Michael P. Carey, for the appellees (named defendant et al.).

Hugh I. Manke, for the appellees (defendant Edward Greenwold et al.).

DALY, NORCOTT and FOTI, JS.

FOTI, J.

The plaintiffs in this quo warranto1 action appeal from the trial court's judgment in favor of the defendants. The plaintiffs claim that the trial court erred (1) in failing to find that the reform ordinance was not an illegal recall, (2) in basing its decision on another trial court decision, and (3) in finding that the restructuring ordinance was saved by permissible goals. We find no error.

The plaintiffs, five former...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases