GARFINKLE v. PFIZER, INC.


162 A.D.2d 197 (1990)

Norton Garfinkle, Respondent, v. Pfizer, Inc., et al., Appellants

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.

June 12, 1990


In view of the well-established considerations for enforcement of restrictive employment covenants (see, Greenwich Mills Co. v Barrie House Coffee Co., 91 A.D.2d 398, 400-401 [2d Dept 1983]), the defendants have failed to raise a triable issue of fact that would preclude summary judgment. There was no showing that the plaintiff employee is in possession of any trade secrets or other confidential information not available to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases