MARPOSS CORP. v. AUTOCAM CORP.

Docket No. 112407.

183 Mich. App. 166 (1990)

454 N.W.2d 194

MARPOSS CORPORATION v. AUTOCAM CORPORATION

Michigan Court of Appeals.

Decided April 3, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Butzel, Long, Gust, Klein & Van Zile (by James C. Bruno and Susan Carino Nystrom), for plaintiff.

Gruel, Mills, Nims & Pylman (by Scott R. Melton), for defendant.

Before: MURPHY, P.J., and HOOD and NEFF, JJ.


PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals as of right from a default judgment entered by the circuit court. We reverse and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion.

I

Defendant first contends that the trial court erred in finding that a default had been properly entered. We agree.

Defendant filed a motion for summary disposition pursuant to MCR 2.116 and a motion for change of venue pursuant to MCR 2.223. Both motions were denied. Defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases