1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Cal.App.3d
  4. 225 Cal.App.3d
  5. 225 Cal.App.3d 107 (1990)
 

PACIFIC BELL v. CALIF. ST. & CONSUMER SERV. AG.

Docket No. A048658.

225 Cal.App.3d 107 (1990)

275 Cal. Rptr. 62

PACIFIC BELL, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. CALIFORNIA STATE AND CONSUMER SERVICES AGENCY et al., Defendants and Respondents; GTEL, Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division Three.

November 15, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, C. Douglas Floyd, Ronald E. Van Buskirk, Pauline Fox, Nossaman, Guthner, Knox & Elliott, William T. Bagley and Jose E. Guzman, Jr., for Plaintiff and Appellant.

John K. Van de Kamp, Attorney General, Richard M. Frank, Floyd D. Shimomura and Daniel G. Stone, Deputy Attorneys General, for Defendants and Respondents.

Lillick & McHose, Charles E. Patterson, Jeffrey A. Rich and Robert A. Gutkin for Real Party in Interest and Respondent.

OPINION

STRANKMAN, J.

The California Department of General Services (DGS) announced its intent to award a contract worth over $109 million to GTEL, a California corporation, for the acquisition of a new state telecommunications system known as CALNET. Pacific Bell then filed a petition for writ of mandate and complaint for declaratory relief, seeking invalidation of that award and other related relief. Judgment was entered denying...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases