1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ariz.
  4. 167 Ariz.
  5. 167 Ariz. 155 (1990)
 

ARNOLD v. BD. OF PARDONS AND PAROLES

No. 2 CA-CV 90-0009.

167 Ariz. 155 (1990)

805 P.2d 388

James ARNOLD, Kenneth M. Clayton, David O. Williams, and Derrell Doyal, Plaintiffs/Appellants, v. ARIZONA BOARD OF PARDONS AND PAROLES, Patricia Veliz Gilbert; Ray R. Florez; Ron Johnson; Darwin H. Aycock; Arter L. Johnson; Richard M. Ortiz; Frank R. Startzell, Defendants/Appellees.

Court of Appeals of Arizona, Division 2, Department B.

Review Denied February 20, 1991.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Stompoly & Stroud, P.C. by Don Awerkamp, Tucson, for plaintiffs/appellants.

Robert K. Corbin, Atty. Gen. by Bruce L. Skolnik, Tucson, for defendants/appellees.

OPINION

FERNANDEZ, Chief Judge.

Appellants challenge two trial court rulings on appeal: its ruling that a Board of Pardons and Paroles regulation does not violate the ex post facto clause of either the state or federal constitution, and its denial of attorney's fees to appellants. We find no error and affirm.

Appellants James Arnold, Kenneth Clayton, David Williams, and Derrell Doyal are inmates of the Arizona State Prison Complex in Tucson. All are...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases