1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 83 Md.
  5. 83 Md. App. 228 (1990)
 

HRESKO v. HRESKO

No. 1460, September Term, 1989.

83 Md. App. 228 (1990)

574 A.2d 24

JAMES A. HRESKO v. MARIE C. HRESKO.

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland.

June 1, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John W. Trotz (James L. Prichard, on the brief), Baltimore, for appellant.

Cynthia E. Young, Annapolis, for appellee.

Argued before GILBERT, C.J., and BISHOP and ALPERT, JJ.

ALPERT, Judge.

In Hamilos v. Hamilos, 297 Md. 99, 465 A.2d 445 (1983), the Court of Appeals held that an enrolled decree will not be vacated even though obtained by use of forged documents, perjured testimony, or any other frauds which are intrinsic to the trial of the case itself. In the present case, this court encounters for the first time the question of whether the fraudulent concealment...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases