Appellant alleges that the BTA's decision was unreasonable and unlawful because it was not based upon the highest and best use of the subject property, because the BTA's valuation was based upon actual sales of other property, and because appellant's constitutional rights were not protected.
Appellees argue that the decision of the BTA is supported by substantial probative evidence and is...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
