1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. N.J.
  4. 119 N.J.
  5. 119 N.J. 185 (1990)
 

STATE v. VELEZ

119 N.J. 185 (1990)

574 A.2d 445

STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF, v. ALDO VELEZ, DEFENDANT. STATE OF NEW JERSEY, PLAINTIFF-RESPONDENT, v. JAMES NEGVESKY, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.

The Supreme Court of New Jersey.

Decided May 31, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas A. Pavics argued the cause for appellant (Schachter, Cohn, Trombadore & Offen, attorneys).

Robert E. Bonpietro, Deputy Attorney General, argued the cause for respondent (Robert J. Del Tufo, Attorney General of New Jersey, attorney).

PER CURIAM.

We granted defendant James Negvesky's petition for certification, 117 N.J. 79, 563 A.2d 839 (1989), to resolve a conflict between Appellate Division panels over whether a defendant who committed a criminal drug offense before the effective date of the Comprehensive Drug Reform Act of 1986 (CDRA), N.J.S.A. 2C:35-1 to -23, has the absolute right to demand to be sentenced under the more...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases