TWAIN HARTE ASSOCIATES, LTD. v. COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE

Docket No. F011310.

217 Cal.App.3d 71 (1990)

265 Cal. Rptr. 737

TWAIN HARTE ASSOCIATES, LIMITED et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF TUOLUMNE et al., Defendants and Respondents.

Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District.

January 11, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

COUNSEL

Wilson, Sher, Marshall & Peterson, Timothy F. O'Leary, W. Stephen Wilson and Lauren M. La Pietra for Plaintiffs and Appellants.

Stephen Dietrich, Jr., County Counsel, Leo J. Faulstich and Paul Griebel, Deputy County Counsel, for Defendants and Respondents.


OPINION

DIBIASO, J.

Appellants1 sued for inverse condemnation and declaratory relief, alleging that the adoption of a Tuolumne County (the County) ordinance rezoning a portion of a parcel of real property they owned constituted a "taking" for which just compensation must be paid. The trial court granted summary judgment in favor of the County, on the ground no taking had occurred and owners had failed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases