STATE v. HEINISH

No. 88-1817.

50 Ohio St. 3d 231 (1990)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. HEINISH, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 25, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Carmen M. Marino, for appellee.

J. William Petro and Thomas S. Hudson, for appellant.


WRIGHT, J.

I

Appellant asserts in his first two propositions of law that the trial court erred in allowing the coroner to testify to the fact that the victim's body was burned when it could not be determined that the burning of the body caused the victim's death. Appellant also claims that the court's denial of a voir dire of the coroner prior to the coroner's testimony deprived appellant of a fair trial.

Appellant argues that since the condition...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases