1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 52 Ohio
  5. 52 Ohio St. 3d 228 (1990)
 

KING v. HOUSEL

No. 89-536.

52 Ohio St. 3d 228 (1990)

KING, APPELLEE, v. HOUSEL, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 11, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Reminger & Reminger Co., L.P.A., Mario C. Ciano and Nicholas D. Satullo, for appellee.

Robert V. Housel and Patricia A. Snyder, for appellant.

MOYER, C.J.

Defendant contends that his agreement with plaintiff does not provide for any contingency payment, and even if there were such a provision, it would be unenforceable because it was not disclosed to his clients as required by DR 2-107(A)(1). DR 2-107(A) provides:

"(A) A lawyer shall not divide a fee for legal services with another lawyer who is not a partner in or associate of his law firm or law office, unless:

"(1) The client consents...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases