WOLF v. CUYAHOGA FALLS CITY SCHOOL DIST. BD. OF EDN.

No. 89-944.

52 Ohio St. 3d 222 (1990)

WOLF, APPELLANT, v. CUYAHOGA FALLS CITY SCHOOL DISTRICT BOARD OF EDUCATION ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided July 11, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Green, Haines, Sgambati, Murphy & Macala Co., L.P.A., Ronald G. Macala and Anne Piero Silagy, for appellant.

Whalen & Compton Co., L.P.A., G. Frederick Compton, Jr., R. Brent Minney and Karrie M. Kalail, for appellees.


ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

Appellant asserts that she had a binding oral agreement with appellees regarding a promise to a duty-free period. She basically contends that Rump, as an agent of the school board, entered into an enforceable agreement with her by promising to give her a duty-free period in exchange for her promise to teach journalism classes and be the newspaper advisor. Appellant claims that Rump promised her a duty-free period as long as she remained journalism...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases