The defendant moved to dismiss the indictment pursuant to CPL 30.30, alleging that there had been a delay of more than six months in bringing his case to trial, the criminal complaint having been filed against him some 13 months before. As the People commendably concede, a delay of more than six months having been shown by the defendant, it was their burden to demonstrate that the delay was not properly chargeable to them (see, People v Berkowitz,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. HANCOCK
161 A.D.2d 108 (1990)
The People of the State of New York, Respondent, v. Emanuel Hancock, Appellant
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
May 1, 1990
May 1, 1990
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York, First Department.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
