PETERS WELL DRILLING CO. v. HANZULA


242 N.J. Super. 16 (1990)

575 A.2d 1375

PETERS WELL DRILLING CO., PLAINTIFF-APPELLANT, v. JAKOB HANZULA (DECEASED) AND VLADIMIR JOVICH, DEFENDANTS-RESPONDENTS.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided May 15, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Silverman & Rozier, attorneys for appellant (Elizabeth S. Rozier and Robert B. Silverman, on the brief).

Vincent E. Halleran, Jr., attorney for respondents (Vincent E. Halleran, Jr., on the brief).

Before Judges KING, BAIME and KEEFE.


The opinion of the court was delivered by KING, P.J.A.D.

Plaintiff sued to collect money allegedly due for the replacement of a well. Plaintiff lost at trial and now appeals from the judgment dismissing its complaint and awarding compensatory and punitive damages for slander of title on the counterclaim.

Plaintiff claims that the trial judge erred in finding for defendant on the counterclaim because filing a mechanic's notice of intention is absolutely privileged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases