STATE v. COMEN

No. 89-402.

50 Ohio St. 3d 206 (1990)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. COMEN, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided April 18, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael Miller, prosecuting attorney, and Bonnie L. Maxton, for appellee.

James Kura, county public defender, and Barbara J. Slutsky, for appellant.


DOUGLAS, J.

At trial, and before any evidence was presented, appellant was informed by the trial court that the jury would be instructed on three separate occasions: before the opening statements of counsel, after the evidence was presented but before closing arguments, and after closing arguments. At that time, appellant did not object to the court's splitting of instructions.

Following his announced procedure, the trial judge, before counsel's opening statements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases