1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 919 F.2d
  5. 919 F.2d 1579 (1990)
 

LAITRAM CORP. v. CAMBRIDGE WIRE CLOTH CO.

No. 90-1129.

919 F.2d 1579 (1990)

The LAITRAM CORPORATION & Intralox, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. The CAMBRIDGE WIRE CLOTH COMPANY, Defendant-Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 21, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul J. Hayes, Weingarten, Schurgin, Gagnebin & Haynes, Boston, Mass., argued, for plaintiffs-appellants. With him on the brief was Victor B. Lebovici.

William T. Enos, Bernard, Rothwell & Brown, P.C., Washington, D.C., argued, for defendant-appellee. With him on the brief was G. Franklin Rothwell.

Before MARKEY, Circuit Judge, MILLER, Senior Circuit Judge, and BROWNING, District Judge.

MARKEY, Circuit Judge.

The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc. (Laitram) appeal from a grant to Cambridge Wire Cloth Company (CWC) of a summary judgment of non-infringement of Laitram's patents No. 3,870,141 and No. 4,051,949. Laitram Corp. v. Cambridge Wire Cloth Co., No. S 89-756, Order and Memorandum (D.Md. Nov. 1, 1989). We vacate the judgment, remand with instructions to consider dismissal of the complaint, and sanction counsel for both sides.

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases