WRIGHT CONST. CO. THROUGH REMBRANT, INC. v. U.S.

No. 90-1188.

919 F.2d 1569 (1990)

R.B. WRIGHT CONSTRUCTION CO., Through Its Subcontractor, REMBRANT, INC., Appellant, v. The UNITED STATES, Appellee.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

November 20, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Pete Kulmala, Ness, Motley, Loadholt, Richardson & Poole, Barnwell, S.C., argued, for appellant.

Scott Ray, Atty., Commercial Litigation Branch, Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., argued, for appellee. With him on the brief were Stuart E. Gerson, Asst. Atty. Gen., David M. Cohen, Director and Thomas W. Petersen, Asst. Director. Also on the brief was Anne W. Westbrook, Asst. Dist. Counsel, Dept. of the Army, Savannah, Ga., of counsel.

Before PLAGER and LOURIE, Circuit Judges, and FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.


FRIEDMAN, Senior Circuit Judge.

The sole question in this case, here on appeal from the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (Board), is whether a government contract that required the contractor to apply three coats of paint contained an implied exception for previously-painted surfaces which, according to the contractor, required only two coats. The Board held that the contract was unambiguous and required three coats. We affirm.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases