CATTON v. INS. UNDERWRITING ASS'N


242 N.J. Super. 5 (1990)

576 A.2d 1

JOSEPH AND PAULINE CATTON, PLAINTIFFS-APPELLANTS, v. THE NEW JERSEY FULL INSURANCE UNDERWRITING ASSOCIATION, DEFENDANT-RESPONDENT, AND STATE FARM INSURANCE COMPANIES, DEFENDANT.

Superior Court of New Jersey, Appellate Division.

Decided April 10, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marmorstein, Abrams & Solomon, attorney for appellants (Robert Joel Marmorstein, on the brief).

Rooney, Peduto & Rooney, attorneys for respondent, The New Jersey Full Insurance Underwriting Association (Charles A. Rooney, Jr., on the brief).

Before Judges SHEBELL and KEEFE.


PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs Joseph and Pauline Catton appeal from the entry of summary judgment in favor of the defendant New Jersey Full Insurance Underwriting Association, commonly referred to as the JUA. The issue presented on appeal is whether the JUA may rescind an automobile insurance policy after erroneously extending coverage to an "unqualified applicant" under N.J.S.A. 17:30E-3(m) when that applicant did not make any misrepresentations in obtaining the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases