1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 53 Ohio
  5. 53 Ohio St. 3d 186 (1990)
 

PANG v. MINCH

No. 89-442.

53 Ohio St. 3d 186 (1990)

PANG ET AL., APPELLEES AND CROSS-APPELLANTS, v. MINCH ET AL., APPELLANTS AND CROSS-APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided August 29, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Miller & Tolaro Co., L.P.A., Alfred J. Tolaro and James L. Deese, for appellees and cross-appellants.

William J. Coyne, for appellant and cross-appellee, Jack Hamilton.

McNeal, Schick, Archibald & Biro and Fredric E. Kramer, for appellant and cross-appellee, Jerry Lehecka.

DAVIS & YOUNG CO., L.P.A., and L. Roller and Martin J. Murphy, for appellant and cross-appellee, Lynne M. Minch.

Frank A. Ray, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Ohio Academy of Trial Lawyers.2

SWEENEY, J.

I

We will first consider the contention of appellant Minch concerning the trial court's denial of her motion in limine seeking to foreclose consideration of the testimony of Dr. Kaufman by the jury. The basis for the motion was the alleged noncompliance by appellees with former Loc. R. 21 of the Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court. Promulgation of the rule is authorized by Civ. R. 16, which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases