ALAN'S OF ATLANTA, INC., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
MINOLTA CORPORATION, Robert Lathrop, Wolf Camera, Inc., and Charles Wolf, Defendants-Appellees.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
June 22, 1990.
June 22, 1990.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Michael W. Higgins, Higgins & Dubner, Atlanta, Ga., Stephen W. Armstrong, Montgomery, McCracken, Walker & Rhoads, Philadelphia, Pa., John D. Jones, Greene, Buckley, Derieux & Jones, Atlanta, Ga., for plaintiff-appellant.
Neely & Player, Atlanta, Ga., for Minolta and Lathrop.
Jeffrey L. Kessler, Ronald LaRussa, David D. Leitch, Weil, Gotshal & Manges, New York, NY, for defendants-appellees.
David R. Aufdenspring, Powell Goldstein Frazer & Murphy, Atlanta, Ga., for Wolf.
Before FAY and COX, Circuit Judges, and ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge.
United States Court of Appeals, Eleventh Circuit.
ESCHBACH, Senior Circuit Judge:
This case concerns the propriety of summary judgment in an antitrust action brought by a private plaintiff. The action alleges, among other things, violations of sections 2(a), 2(d), 2(e), and 2(f) of the Clayton Act, as amended by the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 U.S.C. §§ 13(a), (d), (e), and (f). The court below concluded that summary judgment was appropriate. After reviewing the record...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.
