STATE v. JAMISON

No. 88-1286.

49 Ohio St. 3d 182 (1990)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. JAMISON, APPELLANT.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided March 7, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur N. Ney, Jr., prosecuting attorney, and William E. Breyer, for appellee.

William E. Flax and Peter Pandilidis, for appellant.


ALICE ROBIE RESNICK, J.

I

The crucial question we decide today involves the admissibility of other acts to establish an accused's identity of the charged offenses. We find the other acts, i.e., robberies, forming a unique, identifiable plan of criminal activity, sufficiently probative as to identity to warrant their admission. To be admissible, these other acts must tend to show by substantial proof "identity" or other enumerated purposes under Evid...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases