1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Wn.
  4. 57 Wn.
  5. 57 Wn. App. 170 (1990)
 

HENSEL PHELPS CONSTR. v. KING COUNTY

No. 21131-5-I.

57 Wn. App. 170 (1990)

787 P.2d 58

HENSEL PHELPS CONSTRUCTION CO., Respondent, v. KING COUNTY, Defendant, SARAH WHITE, ET AL, Appellants.

The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One.

March 5, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William A. Helsell, Deborah L. Martin, Charles H. Van Gorder, Richard S. White, Bradley H. Bagshaw, and Helsell, Fetterman, Martin, Todd & Hokanson, for appellants.

Richard Stanislaw, David C. Burkett, and Stanislaw, Ashbaugh, Chism, Jacobson & Riper, for respondent.

WINSOR, J.

Sarah White and Joseph Steenmeyer, d/b/a Phoenix Painting (Phoenix), appeal from a jury verdict denying them recovery on a claim for compensation based on unanticipated "massive disruption" of the performance of a contract. We affirm.

Phoenix and Hensel Phelps Construction Company (Hensel) entered into a written contract obligating Phoenix to paint the interior and exterior of the 18-story King County Jail for a contract price of $488,415. Hensel...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases