U.S. v. ENRIQUEZ-MUNOZ

No. 89-10256.

906 F.2d 1356 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge Edmundo ENRIQUEZ-MUNOZ, Defendant-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided June 28, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Sean Bruner, Ralls & Bruner, P.C., Tucson, Ariz., for defendant-appellant.

Stephen M. McNamee, U.S. Atty., Susan Ehrlich, Reese V. Bostwick, Assistant U.S. Attys., Tucson, Ariz., for plaintiff-appellee.

Before POOLE, REINHARDT and BEEZER, Circuit Judges.


REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:

Enriquez-Munoz appeals a two-year sentence imposed by the district court. He contends that the court used impermissible factors to justify an upward departure from the Sentencing Guidelines. We vacate the excess portion of Enriquez-Munoz's sentence and reduce it to 10 months, the maximum allowable under the Guidelines.

FACTS

Enriquez-Munoz pled guilty to one count of aiding and abetting in providing false statements...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases