1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 917 F.2d
  5. 917 F.2d 1292 (1990)
 

G.H. MUMM & CIE v. DESNOES & GEDDES, LTD.

Nos. 89-1696, 89-1697.

917 F.2d 1292 (1990)

G.H. MUMM & CIE (Societe Vinicole de Champagne Successeurs of New York, Inc.), Appellant, v. DESNOES & GEDDES, LTD., Cross-Appellant.

United States Court of Appeals, Federal Circuit.

October 25, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Martin J. Beran, of New York City, argued, for appellant. With him on the brief were Laura E. Goldbard and Blum Kaplan.

Robert B. Kennedy, Thomas and Kennedy, of Atlanta, Ga., argued, for cross-appellant.

Before MAYER and PLAGER, Circuit Judges, and SMITH, Senior Circuit Judge.

PLAGER, Circuit Judge.

Appellant G.H. Mumm & Cie (Societe Vinicole de Champagne Successeurs of New York, Inc.) ("Mumm") opposes registration of a mark by Cross-Appellant Desnoes & Geddes, Ltd. ("Desnoes"). The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board ("Board") dismissed Mumm's opposition. Desnoes cross-appeals from a decision of the Board dismissing Desnoes' counterclaim to cancel Mumm's Registration No. 395,907 ('907). As to both dismissals, we affirm.

I...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases