1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 789 P.2d
  5. 789 P.2d 1388 (1990)
 

DENISON v. DOUGLAS COUNTY

LCDC 88-ACK-384; CA A50397.

789 P.2d 1388 (1990)

101 Or.App. 131

Harvey DENISON and Robert McCreary, Petitioners, v. DOUGLAS COUNTY and Land Conservation and Development Commission, Respondents, Donald A. Dole, Intervenor-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided April 4, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gary Firestone, Portland, argued the cause for petitioners. With him on the brief were Jeffery W. Ring and Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe, Portland.

No appearance for respondent Douglas County.

John T. Bagg, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent Land Conservation and Development Com'n. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Inge Dortmund White, Roseburg, argued the cause for intervenor-respondent. With her on the brief was Dole, Coalwell & Clark, P.C., Roseburg.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

RICHARDSON, Presiding Judge.

Petitioners seek review of LCDC's acknowledgment order for Douglas County. They complain only about LCDC's approval of the commercial designation and zoning of and Goal 3 exception for a two and one-half acre retail market area that is part of the 10-acre Briggs farm site.

In Sommer v. Douglas County, 70 Or.App. 465, 689 P.2d 1000 (1984), we reversed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases