1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 914 F.2d
  5. 914 F.2d 1249 (1990)
 

GEARY v. RENNE

Nos. 89-15601, 89-15603, 89-15719 and 89-15720.

914 F.2d 1249 (1990)

Bob GEARY, Robert Silvestri; Dennis Mark; Melissa Gundrun; Wayne Johnson; David Soule; Max Woods; Peter Johnson; Robert Gebert; Election Action; Terence Faulkner; Sudi Trippet, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Louise RENNE, San Francisco City Attorney; Diane Feinstein; Jay Patterson; San Francisco Board of Supervisors; City and County of San Francisco; San Francisco Registrar of Voters, Defendants-Appellants. Dennis MARK; Bob Geary; Robert Silvestri; Terence Faulkner; Max Woods; Alexa Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Michelle CORWIN, Acting Registrar of Voters; Louise Renne, San Francisco City Attorney; City and County of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellants. Dennis MARK; Bob Geary; Robert Silvestri; Terence Faulkner; Max Woods; Alexa Smith, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Michelle CORWIN; Louise Renne, San Francisco City Attorney; City and County of San Francisco, Defendants-Appellees. Bob GEARY, Robert Silvestri; Dennis Mark; Melissa Gundrun; Wayne Johnson; David Soule; Max Woods; Peter Johnson; Robert Gebert; Election Action; Terence Faulkner; Sudi Trippet, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Louise RENNE, San Francisco City Attorney; Diane Feinstein, Mayor; Jay Patterson; San Francisco Board of Supervisors; City and County of San Francisco; San Francisco Registrar of Voters, Defendants-Appellees.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Decided September 14, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arlo Hale Smith, San Francisco, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees-cross-appellants.

Randy Riddle, Deputy City Atty., San Francisco, Cal., for defendants-appellees.

Pebbles Trippet, San Francisco, Cal., in pro. per., for plaintiff-appellee-cross-appellant.

Before SNEED, FARRIS and FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judges.

FARRIS, Circuit Judge:

This case involves a facial challenge to the constitutionality of four sections of California election law. Cal.Elec.Code §§ 3795, 5025, 10012 & 10013.5. Three sections (3795, 5025, and 10013.5) allow the state to remove "false, misleading, or inconsistent" material 1) from candidate statements and 2) from statements made by persons or groups supporting or opposing a question on the ballot, when the

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases