HARKINS AMUSEMENT ENTERPRISES v. GENERAL CINEMA

No. CIV 77-736 PHX CLH.

748 F.Supp. 1414 (1990)

HARKINS AMUSEMENT ENTERPRISES, INC., and Daniel Harkins, individually and doing business as Tower Plaza Cinema 1 and 2, Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL CINEMA CORPORATION, OF ARIZONA, et al., Defendants.

United States District Court, D. Arizona.

August 2, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert C. Hackett, David W. Dow, Mohr, Hackett, Pederson, Blakley, Randolph & Haga, P.C., Phoenix, Ariz., for defendant American Multi-Cinema, Inc.

Harry B. Swerdlow, Cooper, Epstein & Hurewitz, Beverly Hills, Cal., for defendant the Harry Nace Co.

Joel Linzner, Khourie, Crew & Jaeger, San Francisco, Cal., for defendant United Artists Communications, Inc.

Edwin Tobolowsky, N. Henry Simpson, Tobolowsky, Prager & Schlinger, Dallas, Tex., David N. Farren, Shimmel, Hill, Bishop & Gruender, P.C., William P. French, Ann A. Scott Timmer, Scult, Lazarus & French, P.A., Phoenix, Ariz., for plaintiffs.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

HARDY, District Judge.

When the Court reversed summary judgment in favor of all defendants in Harkins Amusement Enterprises v. General Cinema Corporation, 850 F.2d 477 (9th Cir. 1988), it noted at Footnote 4: "The distributors brought their partial summary judgment motion jointly, and have not attempted to argue that some are entitled to judgment on certain claims while others are not...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases