TOLEDO TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO. 63 v. N.L.R.B.

No. 89-1481.

907 F.2d 1220 (1990)

TOLEDO TYPOGRAPHICAL UNION NO. 63, Petitioner, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD.

United States Court of Appeals, District of Columbia Circuit.

Decided July 17, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James B. Coppess, with whom Marsha Berzon, Richard Rosenblatt, and Samuel C. McKnight were on the brief for petitioner.

John H. Ferguson, Attorney, N.L.R.B., with whom Robert E. Allen, Associate General Counsel, and Aileen A. Armstrong, Deputy Associate General Counsel, were on the brief for respondent. Steven B. Goldstein also entered an appearance for respondent.

Before D.H. GINSBURG, SENTELLE, and THOMAS, Circuit Judges.


Opinion for the Court filed by Circuit Judge D.H. GINSBURG.

D.H. GINSBURG, Circuit Judge:

Toledo Typographical Union No. 63 represents the composing room employees of the company that publishes the Toledo Blade, a daily newspaper. In negotiations over a new collective bargaining agreement (CBA), the Employer insisted upon the inclusion of a clause allowing it to deal directly with employees over retirement issues, and to exclude the Union from such individual...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases