1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 786 P.2d
  5. 786 P.2d 1325 (1990)
 

STEINBACH v. OREGON STATE BD. OF PHARMACY

A51111.

786 P.2d 1325 (1990)

100 Or.App. 596

Howard STEINBACH, R.Ph., Petitioner, v. OREGON STATE Board of Pharmacy, Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided February 21, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry Kane, Beaverton, argued the cause and filed the briefs for petitioner.

Robert M. Atkinson, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., and WARREN and ROSSMAN, JJ.

PER CURIAM.

In this proceeding under ORS 183.400, petitioner challenges the validity of rules adopted by the State Board of Pharmacy (Board). He contends that the Board exceeded its statutory rule-making authority by adopting rules governing the use of support personnel in the practice of pharmacy. Subsequent to the initiation of this action, the legislature amended ORS 689.225(4) to authorize the adoption of rules relating to the use of support personnel. Or Laws...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases