Petitioner seeks review of a Board of Parole order that revoked his parole. He contends that, at the time of the Board's action, he was no longer on parole, because his "good time" release date had passed. However a prisoner does not accumulate good time while on parole, and the original good time release date is suspended. Ventris v. Maass, 99 Or.App. 85,
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ASHER v. STATE BOARD OF PAROLE
CA A60194.
786 P.2d 1323 (1990)
100 Or.App. 592
Adron Daniel ASHER, Petitioner, v. STATE BOARD OF PAROLE, Respondent.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
Argued and Submitted October 27, 1989.
Decided February 21, 1990.
Reconsideration Denied March 28, 1990.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Gary D. Babcock, Public Defender, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for petitioner.
Douglas F. Zier, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondent. On the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., and Keith W. Wingfield, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem.
Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
