The city moves to dismiss this action on the ground that plaintiff was its "employee" at the time of the accident and, therefore, that the action is barred by the Workers' Compensation Law. The case presents a question which has not been resolved in the reported cases: whether a public welfare recipient who is required to work for a municipal agency as a condition of receiving that aid is an "employee" within the meaning of section...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
