1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Ohio
  4. 51 Ohio
  5. 51 Ohio St. 3d 157 (1990)
 

STATE v. BISTRICKY

No. 89-708.

51 Ohio St. 3d 157 (1990)

THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLANT, v. BISTRICKY ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 30, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

John T. Corrigan, prosecuting attorney, and Jack H. Hudson, for appellant.

Weston, Hurd, Fallon, Paisley & Howley and Thomas C. Buford, for intervener trial court.

Nick Tomino, director of law, and Gary R. Williams, urging reversal for amicus curiae, city of Cleveland.

Patrick A. D'Angela, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Cleveland Police Patrolmen's Association.

Paul L. Cox, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Fraternal Order of Police of Ohio, Inc.

Chattman, Garfield, Friedlander & Paul and Douglas J. Paul, urging affirmance for amicus curiae, Fraternal Order of Police, Cleveland Lodge No. 8.

MOYER, C.J.

The state raises three issues. Two concern the substantive law questions resulting from the trial court's rulings, and one challenges the conclusion of the court of appeals that it has no authority to review the trial court's rulings. Because the court of appeals did not render an opinion or judgment on either of the substantive law issues, we will consider only the issue of whether a court of appeals has authority pursuant to R.C. 2945.67 to grant the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases