FORTINO v. QUASAR CO.

No. 87 C 4386.

751 F.Supp. 1306 (1990)

John FORTINO, Carl Meyers, F. William Schulz and Sophie Mustachio, Plaintiffs, v. QUASAR COMPANY, A DIVISION OF MATSUSHITA ELECTRIC CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant.

United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, E.D.

December 7, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Michael A. Reiter, Norman B. Berger, Holleb & Coff, Chicago, Ill., for plaintiffs.

Steven L. Bashwiner, Brian A. Bulger, Timothy J. Patenode, Gail A. Chaney, Katten Muchin & Zavis, Chicago, Ill., for defendant.


MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER

ALESIA, District Judge.

This employment discrimination case is before the court for a decision on the merits with respect to Plaintiffs' John Fortino ("Fortino"), Carl Meyers ("Meyers") and F. William Schulz ("Schulz") Title VII claims. Plaintiffs Fortino, Meyers, Schulz and Sophie Mustachio ("Mustachio") originally filed this action alleging that defendant Quasar Company discriminated against them on the basis of their age in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases