U.S. v. FITOL

No. Cr. 3-89-118(01).

733 F.Supp. 1312 (1990)

UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Rudolph C. FITOL, Defendant.

United States District Court, D. Minnesota, Third Division.

April 6, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Jeffrey S. Paulsen, Asst. U.S. Atty., Minneapolis, Minn., for plaintiff.

Charles Hawkins, Minneapolis, Minn., for defendant.


AMENDED ORDER

DEVITT, District Judge.

A sentencing hearing was held in this matter on March 5, 1990 to determine whether defendant was growing "100 or more marihuana plants" within the meaning of 21 U.S.C. § 841(b)(1)(B)(vii). That section provides for a mandatory five year minimum sentence for violations of Section 841(a) involving "100 or more marihuana plants regardless of weight." Defendant contends that the marihuana "cuttings" he was cultivating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases