1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 794 P.2d
  5. 794 P.2d 1239 (1990)
 

TRIENCO, INC. v. APPLIED THEORY, INC.

CV86-0428; CA A51220.

794 P.2d 1239 (1990)

102 Or.App. 362

TRIENCO, INC., Respondent-Cross-Appellant, v. APPLIED THEORY, INC., Appellant-Cross-Respondent.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided July 5, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James Eickelberg, Corvallis, argued the cause, for appellant, cross-respondent. With him on the briefs, was Eickelberg & Fewell, Corvallis.

Ronald T. Adams, Portland, argued the cause, for respondent, cross-appellant. With him on the brief, was Rappleyea, Beck, Helterline & Roskie, Portland.

No appearances on cross-appeal.

Before RICHARDSON, P.J., and NEWMAN and DEITS, JJ.

NEWMAN, Judge.

Defendant appeals a judgment for plaintiff for $63,000 plus prejudgment interest from August 5, 1982. We affirm. Plaintiff filed a notice of cross-appeal but has not pursued it. We dismiss it as abandoned.

In our earlier opinion, Trienco, Inc. v. Applied Theory, Inc., 91 Or.App. 588, 756 P.2d 66 (1988), we reversed the judgment that had dismissed plaintiff's action...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases