1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. P.2d
  4. 794 P.2d
  5. 794 P.2d 1224 (1990)
 

PETA v. INST. ANIMAL CARE & USE COM.

88C-11844; CA A60341.

794 P.2d 1224 (1990)

102 Or.App. 276

PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS, Appellant, v. INSTITUTIONAL ANIMAL CARE AND USE COMMITTEE OF THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON AND THE UNIVERSITY OF OREGON, Respondents.

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Decided June 27, 1990.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Allen L. Johnson, Eugene, argued the cause for appellant. With him on the briefs was Johnson & Kloos, Eugene.

Rives Kistler, Asst. Atty. Gen., Salem, argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief were Dave Frohnmayer, Atty. Gen., and Virginia L. Linder, Sol. Gen., Salem.

Before BUTTLER, P.J., JOSEPH, C.J., and ROSSMAN, J.

JOSEPH, Chief Judge.

Appellant, People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), is a non-profit animal protection organization with an Oregon membership of about 3,000. Respondents are the Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee, a committee of the University of Oregon created pursuant to federal law, and the university. The committee reviews all proposals for use of vertebrate animals for research at the university. In September, 1988, in order to determine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases