AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF OHIO, INC. v. PUB. UTIL. COMM.

No. 89-903.

51 Ohio St. 3d 150 (1990)

AT&T COMMUNICATIONS OF OHIO, INC. ET AL., APPELLANTS, v. PUBLIC UTILITIES COMMISSION OF OHIO ET AL., APPELLEES.

Supreme Court of Ohio.

Decided May 30, 1990.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Thomas R. Phillips, O. Carey Epps, Dennis S. Pines, Vorys, Sater, Seymour & Pease and William S. Newcomb, Jr., for appellant AT&T Communications of Ohio, Inc.

Stephanie D. Pestello, Douglas W. Trabaris and Clifford O. Arnebeck, Jr., for appellant MCI Telecommunications Corp.

Anthony J. Celebrezze, Jr., attorney general, Robert S. Tongren, Ann E. Henkener and James B. Gainer, for appellee.

Joseph R. Stewart, Bruce Kazee and Anthony P. Gillman, for intervening appellee GTE North, Inc.

William A. Spratley, consumers' counsel, Evelyn R. Robinson-McGriff, Michael McCord, G. James Van Heyde and Colleen L. Mooney, for intervening appellee Office of Consumers' Counsel.


Per Curiam.

AT&T and MCI first argue that GTE did not place the CCLC in issue because GTE did not apply to increase it and, furthermore, that the CCLC is not related to the rates which are the subject of the application. According to appellants, the commission could not have raised in issue the CCLC. We hold that the CCLC is related to the rates which are the subject of the instant application and that the commission could raise it.

In Cleveland...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases